Wedge Angle Confirmation in Computer Controlled Wedge Field

Authors

  • Nasir Ilyas Institute of Space and Science Technology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan AND Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Salman Farrukh Atomic Energy Medical Centre, JPMC Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22034/AJSE2014113

Keywords:

Wedge angle, Variation wedge, Virtual wedge

Abstract

Wedge is a beam amending devices that causes an advanced decrease in the intensity across the beam resulting in a tilt of the isodose curves from their normal positions. The use of a computer-controlled wedge system is an important segment of radiotherapy and increases the uniformity of dose in the target volume. The aim of this study is to verify the virtual wedge angles from the machine setup angles in Siemens’ ONCOR Linear accelerator (Linac) and compare it with published data of different linear accelerators as a function of beam energy and field sizes. This experiment was carried out on Siemens’ ONCOR impression linear accelerator. The doses at different depths were measured by using the CC13 ion chamber. During our work, the source to surface distance was kept 100 cm. The square field sizes on which we worked were 10, 15, and 20 cm2. The selected virtual wedge angles for our study are 15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees. This work was carried out for both photon energies 15 MV and 6 MV, tissue-equivalent water phantom IBA blue water phantom inside which all the observations were taken. The LDA99 detector for the virtual wedge profile was used. The wedge angle was calculated for the Siemen’s given formula. The variation in wedge angle from machine setup angle and published data as a function of beam energy and field sizes were analyzed. The variations increase with field size and wedge angle but decrease with beam energy. Variation is under 3% which is acceptable before treatment planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, Bennet AM, Blom-Goldman U, Brønnum D, Correa C, Cutter D, Gagliardi G, Gigante B, Jensen MB, Nisbet A, Peto R, Rahimi K, Taylor C HP. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 2013;11:987-998.

McDonald MW, Godette KD, Whitaker DJ, Davis LW, Johnstone PAS. Three-Year outcomes of breast intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated boost. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010;77:523-530.

Baselet B, Rombouts C, Benotmane AM, Baatout S, Aerts A. Cardiovascular diseases related to ionizing radiation: The risk of low-dose exposure. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016;38:1623-1641.

Jordon TJ. Megavoltage x-ray beams. BJR Suppl. 1996;25:62-109.

Iyer R, Jhingran A. Radiation injury: imaging findings in the chest, abdomen and pelvis after therapeutic radiation. Cancer Imag. 2006;6:131-139.

Shamsi A, Javad M, Birgani T, Ali M, Arvandi S, Fatahiasl J, et al. Determination of an effective wedge angle by combination of two arbitrary universal wedge fields in radiation therapy of cancer patients with megavoltage photon beams. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2016;17:197-200.

Misbah A, Amjad H, Wazir M, Rizvi SQA. Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges. J. Med. Phys. 2010;35:33-41.

Attalla EM, Abo-Elenein HS, Ammar H, El-Desoky I, Ammar H. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges for ONCOR linear accelerator. J. Med. Phys. 2010;35:164-169.

Chang SX, Gibbons JP, Hill C, Hospital PM. Clinical implementation of non-physical wedges. AAPM Refresh. Course 1999;13.

Kakakhel MB, Kairn T, Kenny J, Seet K, Fielding AL, Trapp J V. Interplay effects during enhanced dynamic wedge deliveries. Phys. Medica. 2013;29:323-332.

Pemler P, Besserer J, Lombriser N. Influence of respiration-induced organ motion on dose distributions in treatments using enhanced dynamic wedges. Med. Phys. 2001;28:2234-2240.

van Santvoort J. Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens virtual wedge. Phys. Med. Biol. 1998;9:2651-2663.

Methode E. Strahlentherapie Originalarbeit eine methode zur qualit itssicherung dynamischer keilfilter. Strahlen. Onkol. 1999;41:39-41.

Pdgorsak EB. Radiation oncology physics: A hand book for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna; 2005.

Behjati M, Sohrabpour M, Shirmardi SP, Amin M, Shirazi M. Dosimetric verification of the Elekta motorized wedge. J. Paramed. Sci. 2018;9:32-41.

Published

2020-10-22

How to Cite

Ilyas, N., and S. Farrukh. “Wedge Angle Confirmation in Computer Controlled Wedge Field”. Advanced Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, Oct. 2020, pp. 113-7, doi:10.22034/AJSE2014113.

Issue

Section

Original Research Article